Registry · 参与方名录
Who uses GHP 谁在使用 GHP——发起方与自我声明采用方
Two registry categories: founding signatories and adopters (self-declared; module-level adoption equally recognized). The secretariat only registers the list — no grading, no conformity assessment. Quality over quantity — only self-declared adopters are listed.
◆ FOUNDINGSignatory
◇ ADOPTEDDeclared adopter
Founding signatories发起方 · 联署进行中
| Sector | Institution / Expert | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| RESEARCH | Academic partner (invited) | Scientific foundation · signatory | INVITED |
| CLINICAL | Clinical experts ×2–3 (invited, personal capacity) | Professional review · signatory | INVITED |
| INDUSTRY | Industry partners ×1–2 (disclosed) | Ecosystem · signatory | INVITED |
| PRACTICE | Longevity / health institutions ×3–5 | First adopters · signatory | INVITED |
| SECRETARIAT | DeepoMe | Secretariat · text editorship | CONFIRMED |
ADOPTERS REGISTRY
First adopters being invited
The adopters registry opens as soon as the first declaration is confirmed. Only real adopters are listed — until then, this space stays blank.
首批采用方邀约进行中——名录仅收录真实采用的机构。
Case stories · voluntarily shared
- Real closed-loop cases — an institution voluntarily submits at least one complete client case (inquiry → testing → interpretation → intervention → re-test review) and authorizes its publication;
- Institution self-account — the case states the institution's self-assessment against the relevant guide's criteria (e.g. GHP-100 structured inquiry tool);
- No assessment — cases are institution-authored; GHP performs no conformity assessment, gives no endorsement and guarantees nothing; registry entries confirmed annually by the institution itself.