GHPGood Healthspan Practice · ghp-ai.com
Reference Implementations · 参考实现

More than one path to compliance 达标的路径不止一条——工具可选,判据不变

Each guide lists two kinds of paths: tool paths (ready software/services) and generic paths (self-built, product-independent). Compliance requires no purchase — tools simply make good practice easier.

Neutrality statement: tool paths below are compiled by the secretariat against public capabilities, for reference — not endorsement. Unlisted tools may equally qualify: the criteria belong to the guide, not the tool. Coverage is annotated by guide code.
100

Inquiry · paths to compliance

Path A · Tool path (one reference)
  • Structured inquiry tool (four-layer template + dual East–West engine) [INQUIRY ENGINE]
  • Covers criteria 100.1–100.6, incl. TCM ten-questions/constitution and functional-medicine ATM questionnaire in parallel
Path B · Generic path (no specific product)
  • Self-built structured forms per GHP-100 criteria (a document template suffices to start)
  • Train staff on the four-layer information model; East–West integration via "functional questionnaire + TCM consultation"
200

Measurement · paths to compliance

Path A · Tool path
  • DNA-methylation multi-dimensional aging test (molecular anchor) [TESTING SERVICE]
  • Re-test alignment pipeline and assay harmonization provided with the report
Path B · Generic path
  • Any third-party methylation-clock laboratory service qualifies as the anchor (criteria require "molecular-level measurement", never a vendor)
  • Physicals + functional + genomic testing combined per criteria; assay harmonization self-managed
300

Interpretation · paths to compliance

Path A · Tool path
  • Three-layer attribution engine (phenotype–function–root-cause network, measured/inferred labelled) [INTERPRETATION ENGINE]
  • Structured storyline and re-test roadmap; covers 300.1–300.5
Path B · Generic path
  • Manually authored by practitioners trained in the three-layer methodology (templates in the guide appendix)
  • Key disciplines: root-cause positioning must reach the root-cause layer; measured vs inferred labelled separately
400

Intervention · paths to compliance

Path A · Tool path
  • Plan engine (root-first ranking + one-theme-per-cycle + pre-registered hypotheses) [PLAN ENGINE]
Path B · Generic path
  • Layer labels and pre-registration via prescription templates (the criteria concern documents, not software)
500

Review · paths to compliance

Path A · Tool path
  • Contribution-analysis engine (same-assay alignment + significance gating + contribution ranking with confidence) [REVIEW ENGINE]
Path B · Generic path
  • Manual re-test review against pre-registered hypotheses (methodology public; tools optional)
600

Inference integrity · paths (cross-cutting)

Path A · Tool path
  • Hypothesis registry + pre-registration + contribution decomposition from one toolchain (shared confidence grading) INFERENCE & REVIEW ENGINES
Path B · Generic path
  • Maintain the three-document set manually per the draft (registry / pre-registration / review)
  • N-of-1 designs per published methodology
Submit a path

Reached the criteria with other tools or in-house practice? Submit an implementation note — registered entries are listed here (no assessment) to help more institutions find their own path. Submit →